What is the Family Justice Modernisation Programme?
The Family Justice Modernisation Programme, spearheaded by Mr Justice Ryder, aims to reform and improve the family law system in England and Wales. Recent updates have highlighted key areas of reform, sparking debates about the efficiency of the current adversarial system and the potential for a more inquisitorial approach. These changes, if implemented, could have profound implications for families navigating the family courts.
Key Highlights from Mr Justice Ryder’s Update
1. Shared Parenting and Legislative Reform
One of the most significant developments mentioned is the potential introduction of legislative changes to promote shared parenting. Amendments to Section 8 of the Children Act 1989 are reportedly under discussion, reflecting a growing recognition of shared parenting’s importance in post-separation arrangements. Shared parenting could become the foundational principle for family law, ensuring that both parents are actively involved in their children’s lives unless there are compelling reasons otherwise.
2. Shift Towards an Inquisitorial Approach
In public law cases, the update suggests a shift from a quasi-inquisitorial to a full inquisitorial approach, where judges take a more active role in managing evidence and determining issues. This change could enable courts to make quicker, more informed decisions, prioritising the welfare of children.
Adversarial vs. Inquisitorial Systems in Family Law
Adversarial System
- How It Works: Each party presents their case, often through legal representatives, with the judge acting as a neutral referee.
- Challenges:
- Unequal Representation: Many cases involve one party represented by a solicitor or barrister while the other is a litigant in person (LIP), leading to imbalances.
- Focus on Winning: The adversarial system can prioritise outwitting the opposing party over finding the best outcome for the child.
- Prolonged Conflict: The process often intensifies animosity between parents, further harming the children involved.
Inquisitorial System
- How It Works: The judge actively investigates the case, leading the process to uncover the truth and make decisions based on evidence and welfare principles.
- Advantages:
- Child-Centric: Judges can focus on the child’s welfare rather than being constrained by legal arguments.
- Efficiency: Decisions can be reached more quickly, avoiding prolonged hearings and reducing costs.
- Equality: Reduces the disadvantage faced by LIPs by allowing the judge to lead the inquiry.
Why Shared Parenting Matters
For an inquisitorial system to succeed, shared parenting must become the default starting point. Research consistently shows that children benefit from meaningful relationships with both parents post-separation. Promoting shared parenting:
- Reduces Conflict: Encourages cooperation between parents.
- Supports Welfare: Ensures children maintain bonds with both parents and extended family.
- Sets Clear Expectations: Establishes shared parenting as the norm, reducing disputes over arrangements.
The Need for Change
Challenges in the Current System
- Litigants in Person (LIPs): With restricted access to legal aid, more individuals are representing themselves. Judges must often take a quasi-inquisitorial role to compensate, leading to inconsistencies.
- Prolonged Proceedings: The adversarial approach can extend cases unnecessarily, increasing emotional and financial costs.
- Unbalanced Outcomes: Cases with unequal representation often result in decisions that fail to prioritise the child’s welfare effectively.
Proposed Reforms
- Implementing a fully inquisitorial approach in private family law to align with public law proceedings.
- Training judges to adopt proactive roles from the outset to focus on children’s welfare.
- Legislating shared parenting as the baseline assumption, ensuring fairness and equity.
The Role of Judges in an Inquisitorial System
In an inquisitorial system, judges would:
- Lead Investigations: Actively question both parties to uncover facts.
- Focus on Welfare: Address core issues affecting children’s well-being early in the process.
- Streamline Hearings: Minimise unnecessary disputes by steering discussions towards solutions.
This approach could reduce the adversarial battles that often exacerbate conflicts, fostering a more cooperative environment for resolving disputes.
Conclusion
The Family Justice Modernisation Programme represents a critical opportunity to reshape family law in England and Wales. By adopting an inquisitorial system and promoting shared parenting, the courts could better serve the welfare of children while reducing conflict and inefficiencies.
For these reforms to succeed, the judiciary, government, and society must embrace a child-centred approach, ensuring that every decision prioritises children’s needs and well-being. Change may not happen overnight, but the discussions sparked by Mr Justice Ryder’s update are a step in the right direction.
Useful Resources:
Subscribe to receive updates
Subscribe to receive the latest blog posts to your inbox every week.
